page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139 page 140
page 141
page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
< prev - next > Energy Hydro power civil_works_guidelines_for_micro_hydro (Printable PDF)
CIVIL WORKS GUIDELINES FOR MICRO-HYDROPOWER IN NEPAL
137
iv. During steady state when the turbine was under
operation, the water depth in the chamber remained
below the toe of the screen. Thus, the submergence
depth set initially seemed to be adequate.
v. The water level inside the forebay chamber decreased
by 400 mm compared to the previous case, thus
decreasing the gross head by about 0.7 percent.
Although, the Cha Khola plant has faced intermittent problems
with the generating equipment, to date the screen is
performing satisfactorily.
10.3 De-beader for HDPE pipes
As discussed in Chapter 4 (Box 4.7), HDPE pipes are joined by
heat welding which melts and fuses the ends together. This
leads to raised “beads” on the inside and outside of the pipe
as shown in Photograph 10.2. The external bead is not a
problem but the internal bead promotes blockages and
significant head loss. An effective debeader would reduce
the roughness value for HDPE from 0.06 mm (Table 4.3) to
0.03 mm.
A “debeader” tool has been designed (for IT Nepal) to remove
the internal beads from HDPE pipes while the joints are still
hot (i.e., hot debeading). This equipment has been designed
to remove beads for pipe diameters up to 250 mm. It is still in
the experimental phase and requires some development for
use in the field.
As shown in Photograph 10.3, the debeader consists of a
mild steel shaft with a sleeve on which a bush spring loaded
to a locking collar (via an Alien key) is placed. There are three
hardened steel blades (cutter arms) that are pin connected by
rectangular steel bars to the bush. By unlocking the bush the
connecting pin can slid up the sleeve to increase the cutting
diameter.
Debeading with this tool is done by first unlocking the bush
so that the tool can fit inside the pipe. A mild steel rod with a
handle is connected to the debeader such that the handle
sticks out of the pipe. The rod is supported by a number of
mild steel discs inside the pipe (smaller than the HDPE pipe
diameter) for lateral stability. The de-beader is then placed
inside of the pipe such that it is about 100 mm in front of the
proposed joint. The radius of the cutting arms are then
arranged by sliding the bush such that the blades are in
contact with the inside pipe surface. Once the blades snugly
fit on the pipe surface, there is a clicking sound indicating
that the cutting arms have been locked. As soon as the two
pipe ends are joined by heat welding as discussed in Chapter
4, the debeader is pushed forward till the blades come in
contact with the beads. The handle is then turned and the
debeader is pushed forward which removes the bead.
This de-beader was tested at Nepal Yantra Shala Energy,
Kathmandu, on a 200 mm pipe as shown in Photograph 10.4.
Debeading was tried on a joint about 2 m from one end of the
pipe. The test was partially successful. It was not possible to
remove the entire strip of the bead. Part of the bead and some
thin strands were left on the joint, as can be seen in
Photograph 10.4.
The following observations were made in the workshop:
The major constraint was that the radius of the cutter blades
is fixed and the blades do not work equally well on all pipe
diameters within the range.
If debeading is not started immediately after the pipes are
joined (i.e. within 30 seconds), the beads cannot be
removed.
The turning of the handle and pushing of the de-beader
has to be controlled. A sudden jerk pushes the de-beader
beyond the joint.
The debeading process is also hampered if the pipe ends
are not totally circular.
Photo10.4 HDPE pipe joint de-beaded using the de-beader
Photo10.5 HDPE pipe joint de-beaded using a commercial de-beader.
The small ring in front of the pipe section is the bead.